Open collective research Applied chronobotany Living document 2025 2026 Controlled trial running since September 2026

SUPERCYCLE

HACKING THE PHOTOPERIOD
Non genetic temporal reprogramming through extended light dark cycles
APPLIED CHRONOBOTANY HYPOTHESIS
MISSION:
Evaluate whether supercycles longer than 24 hours reprogram plant development without genetic intervention
§501 .1

THE QUESTION

WHY A 24 HOUR DAY?

The revolution begins when you stop asking how to do 12/12 better... and start asking why 12/12 was ever considered natural in the first place.

We are breaking the circadian dogma by hacking time itself. We test extended light dark architectures known as supercycles. Results show significant terpene increases, higher THC levels and greater floral mass. From 14 14 onward, consistent morphological changes and new flowering architectures emerge.

This page functions as a collaborative pre print summary with concise claims, traceable modules and reproducible protocols.

stable // baseline supercycle
13/13
MORE RESIN THC AND FLOWER MASS
active // morphogenesis window
14/14
NEW TERPENE PROFILES AND MORPHOGENESIS
experimental // frontier cycle
16/16
UNKNOWN TERRITORY

This is not a calendar. It is evolution.

§502 .2

HYPOTHESIS

TEMPORAL REPROGRAMMING

Temporal Reprogramming

Extending the virtual day beyond 24 hours while preserving full, uninterrupted darkness forces plants to entrain to a longer beat. Under supercycles like 13/13 or 15/15, we see a new equilibrium between daytime assimilation and deep night resets, favoring trichome development, terpene biosynthesis, and stable, non stress morphologies compared to 12/12 controls.

"Time is a parameter, not a prison. We stopped obeying the Sun’s clock."
§02 .1

THE SACRIFICE

THE LAW OF PHOTON EXCHANGE

Inside a 24-hour cycle, more light equals less darkness. This checks the plant into a corner.

Short nights risk revegetation; long nights cap daily energy input.

Inside 24 h you must choose your wound.

CYCLE DAY NIGHT NOTE
14/10 14 h 10 h PHYTOCHROME NOT FULLY OFF
13/11 13 h 11 h STILL RISK IN SOME STRAINS
12/12 12 h 12 h BALANCED BUT CAPPED BY TIME
13/14 SC 13 h 14 h More light & full dark outside 24h
Concepts grounded in photoperiodism, phytochrome dynamics, and DLI literature. Selected references below.
  • Photoperiodism and flowering control fundamentals
  • Phytochrome dark reversion and night length signaling
  • Daily Light Integral and yield limitation in controlled environments
§02 .2

THE CONSTRAINT

Why research stayed inside 24h

Most cannabis studies compared 12/12 13/11 14/10 but always within a 24 hour frame. Add light hours you steal night. Add night you lose photons. The clock itself became the constraint. Not only growers inherited 24 hour methods. Scientists also inherited them trusting the circadian framework because nearly all experimental evidence came from cycles inside 24 hours.

We did not just inherit cultivation methods we inherited time. Chronobotany breaks the cage.
BOX A

HATER TIP

THE MYTH OF THE 24H DAY
MYTH

Is 24 Hours a Biological Law?

Premise: Earth’s day is not fixed at exactly 24 hours. Lunar tidal friction slowly transfers angular momentum, which reduces Earth’s rotation rate over geologic time.

Late Precambrian
~21.9h
Late Cretaceous
~23.5h
Future
~25h+
SUPERCYCLE
Key reference
Williams, G.E. (1989). Tidal rhythmites: geochronometers for the ancient Earth–Moon system. Episodes, 12(3): 162–171.

Conclusion: 12/12 is a habit. Extending to 13/13, 14/14 is not "breaking biology" it’s exploring time as a controllable parameter.

Forward note: if day length keeps drifting, “natural” outdoor cultivation will keep shifting too. A world where 13/13 (or longer) is a real boundary condition is not science fiction, it’s a geologic trendline.

HYVE hypothesis

CULTIVATE LIKE THE FUTURE, TODAY.

Earth’s day length drifts over geologic time. If longer days are inevitable, why wait millennia? Supercycles are a time machine: a controlled way to test tomorrow’s day length regimes now.

§03 .1

VISUAL PROOF

12/12 VS 13/14 SIDE BY SIDE
Same clone • Cut day 65
EVIDENCE_CLIP

VISUAL PROOF

Direct comparison of 12/12 (24h) vs 13/14 (27h) side by side. Note the structural difference, 12/12 caps energy input, while 13/14 drives continuous bract expansion.

THIS CHANGES EVERYTHING.
§032
CHEMICAL PROOF
IACA LAB REPORTS
Same plant comparisons where possible.
YETI (AERO) • 13/14 (27h)
186.9 mg/g THCtotal +7.4%
Total terpenes: 18,543 µg/g (+21.7% vs 12/12)
HPLC-UV (IACA), dried flower • 12/12 vs 13/14 • THCtotal equiv reported
Aura 86 (cola tip, day 65) • 13/14 (27h)
13,367 µg/g total terpenes +15.3%
12/12: 11,598 µg/g → 13/14: 13,367 µg/g
GC-FID (IACA), dried flower • “cola tips, day 65” paired sample
TABLE §03.2-4 Cross sample KPI summary
High-level results (the hook). Expand for full tables.
YETI: +21.7% terps YETI +21.7% Aura86: +15.3% terps Aura +15.3% YETI: +7.4% THC THC +7.4% OPEN
Sample Terps 12/12 Terps 13/14 Δ% THCtotal 12/12 THCtotal 13/14
YETI (AERO) 15,235 18,543 +21.7% 174.0 186.9
Aura 86 (cola tip, day 65) 11,598 13,367 +15.3%
Interpretation: in these paired datasets, 13/14 shows higher total terpene load in both YETI and Aura 86, and higher THCtotal equiv in YETI. Evidence-only: it does not claim universal superiority across cultivars.
TABLE §03.2-1 — Cannabinoid profile (YETI)
Units: mg/g (dried flower). Δ uses LOQ/2 for “<1” for aggregation only.
+7.4% OPEN
Cmpd Name 12/12 13/14 Δ
8-THC delta-8-tetrahydrocannabinol <1 <1 +0
9-THC delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol 24 186 +162
CBC cannabicromeno <1 2 +2
CBD cannabidiol <1 <1 +0
CBDA cannabidiol ácido <1 <1 +0
CBDV cannabidivarin <1 <1 +0
CBG cannabigerol <1 4 +4
CBL cannabicyclol <1 <1 +0
CBN cannabinol <1 3 +3
THCA delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol ácido 171 1 -170
THCV tetrahidrocannabivarin <1 <1 +0
Notes: THCtotal equiv = Δ9-THC + 0.877×THCA. Values reported as “<1” treated as LOQ/2 for aggregation only. Source: IACA report — sample label “YETI 12/12” vs “YETI 13/14 AERO”.
TABLE §03.2-2 — Terpene profile (YETI)
Units: µg/g (dried flower). Total terpenes shown in header.
+21.7% OPEN
Terpene 12/12 13/14 Δ
(+)-Nerolidol 251 249 -2
(-)-Isopulegol 36 35 -1
(-)-β-Pinene 440 346 -94
Camphene 70 49 -21
Geraniol 70 76 +6
Llinalool 1427 1393 -34
Terpinolene 13 25 +12
d-Llimonene 2059 2278 +219
p-Cymene 4 4 +0
α-Bisabolol 428 343 -85
α-Guaiol 1123 1438 +315
α-Humulene 1268 1828 +560
α-Pinene 209 149 -60
α-Terpinene 5 5 +0
β-Caryophylene 3933 5667 +1734
β-Myrcene 3833 4616 +783
β-Ocimene 39 23 -16
γ-Terpinene 23 15 -8
δ-3-Carene 4 4 +0
Values reported as “<1” treated as LOQ/2 for totals only. Source: IACA report — “YETI 12/12” vs “YETI 13/14 AERO”.
TABLE §03.2-3 — Terpene profile (Aura 86, cola tip day 65)
Units: µg/g (cola tips). Paired 12/12 vs 13/14 sample.
+15.3% OPEN
Terpene 12/12 13/14 Δ
(+)-Nerolidol 1444 1746 +302
(-)-Isopulegol 6 5 -1
(-)-β-Pinene 432 443 +11
Camphene 71 73 +2
Geraniol <1 13 +12
Llinalool 773 1004 +231
Terpinolene 9 16 +7
d-Llimonene 1387 1877 +490
p-Cymene <1 <1 +0
α-Bisabolol 43 28 -15
α-Guaiol 46 40 -6
α-Humulene 1375 1429 +54
α-Pinene 227 237 +10
α-Terpinene 26 26 +0
β-Caryophylene 5098 5423 +325
β-Myrcene 638 981 +343
β-Ocimene <1 <1 +0
γ-Terpinene <1 5 +4
δ-3-Carene 21 20 -1
Method: GC-FID. Samples: “punta día 65” (cola tips). Source: IACA report.
§503

OBSERVATIONS AND PHENOTYPES

PHENOTYPIC EXPRESSION
LIVE
This is a live investigation

This section tracks ongoing anomalies and phenotypes. For the newest field reports (photos, clips, timestamps), browse HYVE_Explorer. (Updated continuously by the community.)

Supercycle HYVE — HYVE_Explorer
HYVE_Explorer. Live network explorer for protocols, reports, phenotypes, and replication logs.

This is an ongoing open investigation. Supercycles do not only change timing. They reshape morphology and flowering architecture.

The full phenotype catalog with visual evidence lives in the Atlas.
Each entry maps to traceable trials.

§03 .4

THE CONTROLLED TRIAL

FOUR PERIODS RUNNING IN PARALLEL
RUNNING NOW
From field reports to a controlled comparison

Everything above this section comes from grows we do not control: different rooms, different operators, different genetics, no paired control arm. Those reports are good enough to decide what to measure. They are not good enough to attribute an effect. So the hypothesis moved into a controlled trial.

Four identical cubicles of 1 x 1 x 2 m. Four cloned genetics, each one repeated in all four cubicles. One 300 W fixture per cubicle, the same substrate, the same irrigation scheme. The only thing that changes between rooms is the length of the cycle.

The working hypothesis is that the endogenous circadian period of Cannabis sativa may sit close to 27 hours. If it does, an external 27 h cycle should behave differently from a 24 h one. This trial does not measure the endogenous period: a result in line with the hypothesis would be indirect evidence, not a measurement.

Trial timelapse. The four cubicles on one screen, one frame every five minutes since day 1 of flowering.
THE FOUR ARMS
ARM PERIOD T DISTANCE TO 27 H ROLE IN THE HYPOTHESIS
12/1224 h−3 h Reference control.
13/1326 h−1 h Period close to the proposed value.
13/1427 h0 Central period of the hypothesis. Highest yield predicted.
14/1428 h+1 h Contrast, to see the response on both sides of 27 h.
THE 13/14 ARM RECEIVES 3.7% LESS LIGHT PER CALENDAR DAY THAN 12/12. IF IT STILL WEIGHS MORE, THE ANSWER IS NOT PHOTONS.

11.56 h of light per calendar day against 12 h, with 3.7% more darkness. A higher dry weight under less light would point at what the plant does with carbon already fixed, not at how much light it got.

PRIMARY VARIABLE

Dry flower weight per plant, cut when the trichomes in a fixed, pre-declared zone stop being mostly clear and the first amber ones appear. Cut dates differ between arms, so calendar days, executed cycles and accumulated light hours are reported as part of the result, not as context.

DECLARED LIMITS

Published before the first plant was cut, because a limit found afterwards is an excuse:

  • One plant per genetic per arm. The replication unit is the genotype, not the plant.
  • One cubicle per arm. Two photoperiods cannot share a room, so room differences ride along with the period.
  • Irrigation is manual and the person watering knows which arm they are looking at.
  • PAR measurement is still pending: PPFD and DLI are estimates derived from the declared flux.
  • One site, one operator. Independent replication is what would tell us whether this generalizes.
PREPRINT

Circadian resonance in Cannabis sativa. Yield, morphology and resin under four periods with paired clones. Version 0.3, 2 September 2026. Results expected November 2026.

§04 .1

MANIFESTO

SUPERCYCLE
WE HACK TIME

We utilize open source hardware to decouple plant biology from Earth rotation. We view the 24-hour cycle not as a law, but as a variable.

THE TRAP
Problem: the 24 hour day

The 24‑hour day is not a law of nature for indoor cultivation it’s an inheritance. A convention that became “normal” because every timer, calendar and workflow assumes it.

"We didn’t just inherit cultivation methods, we inherited time."

Under 12/12, the night is fixed but the day is capped by the 24h container. Supercycles break that container while keeping deep darkness intact.

THE HACK
Solution: supercycle

We’re temporal hackers rewriting the rules of botany. By extending the virtual day to 26h, 28h, or 32h, we decouple light from darkness.

Supercycles allow us to push 14+ hours of light while maintaining 12+ hours of deep darkness. No compromise.

"Time is a parameter, not a prison."

Video evidence anchor 12/12 vs supercycle framing & context.
§504.2 .2

GUIDANCE FOR BREEDERS

Selection protocols in non 24h environments

For decades selection took place inside a 24 hour time cage. This was not a biological decision. It was a human convenience.

  1. Selecting exclusively under 12/12 did not refine the genetic pool. It created a temporal bottleneck. Only genotypes compatible with 12/12 survived and reproduced. Other expressions remained invisible not due to genetic inferiority but due to lack of temporal context.
  2. Supercycles expose this hidden variation. Genotype by Environment interaction allows strains that perform poorly in 12 12 to become elite under 16 16.
  3. 13/13 acts as a stress test. Close enough to 12/12 for compatibility and far enough to reveal vigor.
  4. The next phase is Supercycle Breeding. Selection for temporal plasticity integrity under long days and non senescence.
§505 .1

HOW TO RUN ONE

BREAKING THE 24H BARRIER

How a supercycle is run today

A cycle that does not add up to 24 hours cannot be loaded into an ordinary timer: a timer repeats every 24 h by definition. It needs a controller that computes each transition, executes it, and records the one that actually happened. That is what Supercycler does.

  1. Create the zone. One zone per physical room, in the web app or in the phone app. Same account on all three.
  2. Link the device that cuts the light. Shelly, Sonoff, Tuya, AC Infinity, Mars Hydro, Spider Farmer, TrolMaster, Home Assistant or an ESP32 of your own.
  3. Give it the light role and load the cycle. Hours ON and hours OFF, with no obligation to add up to 24. 13/13, 13/14, 15/15 and 16/16 are all valid.
  4. Anchor it to a date and a time. From that instant the app computes every transition on its own, and keeps doing it while the phone is off.
  5. Read SC, not DAY. The header counts completed supercycles alongside the calendar day. Two grows on different periods are comparable by SC, never by day.
  6. Check adherence. The light action log keeps the expected transition next to the confirmed one. That log is what makes a replication verifiable instead of anecdotal.
One warning

Changing the photoperiod mid-grow re-anchors the clock. The app warns you when the change flips the state of the light at that very instant and asks you to confirm. It is deliberate: doing it without looking is what ruins the most grows.

What was missing, and now exists

This page used to list these three as "coming soon". They shipped:

  • Mobile app, Android and iOS. On Google Play since June 2026 and on the App Store since 27 July 2026.
  • Execution that does not depend on the device clock. The schedule is computed on the server and each transition is sent and confirmed, so a plug that only knows 24 h routines can still run 27.
  • A place where the cycles of the network actually run. Not a hub in a drawer: rooms in production, with their environment, their irrigation and their log.
HARDWARE THAT ALREADY RUNS IT

Shelly · Sonoff / eWeLink · Tuya · AC Infinity · Mars Hydro · Spider Farmer · VIVOSUN · TrolMaster · Home Assistant · Ecowitt · ESP32

THE APP, RUNNING
Supercycler dashboard with the light widget and the SC counter
The dashboard. The light widget carries the state, the countdown to the next transition and SC 1·1, the supercycle counter, next to WEEK and DAY. Below it, temperature, humidity and VPD of the room.
Device onboarding screen with the supported brands
Adding a device. The wizard asks what you are connecting. Shelly and Sonoff run locally; Tuya goes through its cloud. Below, the grow-control hardware: Pulse, Bluelab, TrolMaster, Ecowitt, Home Assistant, an ESP32 of your own.
Grow journal with the tasks of the day
The journal. The day's tasks come from the protocol, indexed to the executed cycle and not to the calendar. Each report can carry notes and photos, and that is what turns a grow into a record you can go back to.
§506 .1

PROJECT STATUS

NETWORK OPERATIONS
NODES 120
LINKS 28.08.2026
GENETICS 130
OPERATORS 25
REGIONS 3
SUPERCYCLES 24
Signal over noise. Data before opinion.

This panel shows the network pulse in real time. Nodes and operators reflect human activity. Genetics and supercycles reflect biological and temporal diversity. Each number maps to traceable reports with evidence.

These counters come from the HYVE_Explorer reports and describe the network, not the controlled trial. The four-period trial of §03.4 is reported separately, with its own pre-registration, its own limits and its own dates.